Concepts in .NET Get data matrix barcodes in .NET Concepts

How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:
2. Concepts using barcode development for vs .net control to generate, create datamatrix 2d barcode image in vs .net applications. iPad Background: Traditional Opera Data Matrix barcode for .NET ting Systems What Is a Thread Kernel Interaction The Value of Using Threads What Kinds of Programs to Thread What About Shared Memory Threads Standards Performance. In which the reader is introd uced to the basic concepts of multitasking operating systems and of multithreading as it compares to other programming paradigms. The reader is shown reasons why multithreading is a valuable addition to programming paradigms, and a number of examples of successful deployment are presented..

Background: Traditional Operating Systems Before we get into the detail s of threads, it will be useful for us to have some clear understanding of how operating systems without threads work. In the simplest operating system world of singleuser, single-tasking operating systems such as DOS, everything is quite easy to understand and to use, although the functionality offered is minimal. DOS divides the memory of a computer into two sections: the portion where the operating system itself resides (kernel space[1]) and the portion where the programs reside (user space).

The division into these two spaces is done strictly by the implicit agreement of the programmers involved meaning that nothing stops a user program from accessing data in kernel space. This lack of hardware enforcement is good, because it is simple and works well when people write perfect programs. When a user program needs some function performed for it by kernel code (such as reading a file from a disk), the program can call the DOS function directly to read that file.

. Kernel space is UNIX lingo for this concept, but the concept is valid for all operating systems. Each program has some code th at it runs (which is just a series of instructions, where the program counter points to the current instruction), some data (global and local) that it uses, and a stack where local data and return addresses are stored (the stack pointer designates the current active location on the stack). Figure 2-1 illustrates the traditional DOS operating system memory layout. Thus, as shown in Figure 2-1, the division between user space and kernel space is a division by agreement of the programmers; there is no hardware enforcement of the policy at all.

The drawbacks to this technique are significant, however. Not all programs are written flawlessly, and a programming mistake (or virus!) here can bring down the entire machine or, worse, destroy valued data. Neither can a machine run more than one program at a time, nor can more than one user log in to the machine at a time.

Dealing with networks from DOS machines is somewhat awkward and limited. Figure 2-1. Memory Layout for DOS-Style Operating Systems.

In a typical multitasking ope visual .net Data Matrix rating system such as VMS, UNIX, Windows NT, etc., this dividing line between the user space and the kernel space is solid (Figure 2-2); it"s enforced by the hardware.

There are actually two different modes of operation for the CPUs: user mode, which allows normal user programs to run, and kernel mode, which also allows some special instructions to run that only the kernel can execute. These kernel-mode instructions include I/O instructions, processor interrupt instructions, instructions that control the state of the virtual memory subsystem, and, of course, the change mode instruction. Figure 2-2.

Memory Layout for Multitasking Systems. So a user program can execute only user-mode instructions, and it can execute them only in user space. The data it can access and change directly is also limited to data in user space. When it needs something from the kernel (say, it wants to read a file or find out the current time), the user program must make a system call.

This is a library function that sets up some arguments, then executes a special trap instruction. This instruction causes the hardware to trap into the kernel, which then takes control of the machine. The kernel figures out what the user wants (based upon the data that the system call set up) and whether the user has permission to do so.

Finally, the kernel performs the desired task, returning any information to the user process. Because the operating system has complete control over I/O, memory, processors, etc., it needs to maintain data for each process it"s running.

The data tells the operating system what the state of that process is what files are open, which user is running it, etc. So, the concept of process in the multitasking world extends into the kernel (see Figure 2-2), where this information is maintained in a process structure. In addition, as this is a multitasking world, more than one process can be active at the same time, and for most of these operating systems (notably, neither Windows NT.

nor OS/2), more than one user .NET datamatrix 2d barcode can log in to the machine independently and run programs simultaneously. Thus, in Figure 2-3, process P1 can be run by user Kim while P2 and P3 are being run by user Dan, and P4 by user Bil.

There is also no particular restriction on the amount of memory that a process can have. P2 might use twice as much memory as P1, for example. It is also true that no two processes can see or change each other"s memory unless they have set up a special shared memory segment.

Figure 2-3. Processes on a Multitasking System. For all the user programs in all the operating systems mentioned so far, each has one stack, one program counter, and one set of CPU registers per process. So each of these programs can do only one thing at a time. They are single threaded.

Copyright © . All rights reserved.